ACB Filed Bribery Case To 'Settle Score' With Judge: Ahlmad To Delhi Court

Advertisement

Last Updated:May 25, 2025, 00:08 IST

The ahlmad, 38, was posted successful the tribunal of the Special Judge successful question betwixt September 14, 2023 and March 21, 2025.

The tribunal asked the slope to revise its policy.

A tribunal unit has told a Delhi tribunal that the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) lodged an FIR regarding alleged bribery to framework a justice to “settle people with him" aft helium issued a announcement to its Joint Commissioner asking wherefore a contempt notation not beryllium made to the Delhi High Court for allegedly threatening the staff.

The allegations against the ACB were made earlier Special Judge Deepali Sharma successful an exertion seeking anticipatory bail, filed by an Ahlmad (court unit fro maintains records), claiming helium was guiltless and was falsely implicated successful the bribery case.

The ahlmad, 38, was posted successful the tribunal of the Special Judge successful question betwixt September 14, 2023 and March 21, 2025.

“The ACB is the main litigant successful astir cases pending disposal earlier the said court. During his tenure successful the said court, the officers of ACB, GNCTD, threatened him with dire consequences, owing to which the applicant/accused besides made a petition connected January 25, 2025, for his transportation from the said court," the bail exertion claimed.

“On May 16, 2025, the presiding serviceman passed an bid issuing announcement to the Joint Commissioner of ACB to amusement origin arsenic to wherefore a contempt notation not beryllium made to the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. It is stated that the ACB, GNCTD, successful bid to settee scores with the presiding serviceman of the said court, filed a mendacious and fabricated FIR against the applicant/accused arsenic good arsenic tried to framework the presiding officer," the exertion further claimed.

Judge Sharma connected May 22 dismissed the anticipatory bail exertion aft the nationalist authoritative claimed that the ahlmad’s custodial interrogation was required to unearth the full conspiracy.

The judge, however, directed the ACB to travel the instrumentality if it was a marque the arrest.

The ahlmad further claimed that helium has filed a writ petition earlier the Delhi High Court to transportation the substance to an autarkic investigating agency.

The precocious tribunal has directed the State to record a presumption study and has listed the substance connected May 29.

On February 14, it had turned down ACB’s petition to initiate a probe against the peculiar justice for alleged bribery, saying the probe bureau did not person “sufficient material" against the judge.

However, the precocious tribunal asked the ACB to proceed its probe and suggested that it attack them again if immoderate worldly showing the Special Judge’s engagement is found.

On May 16, the ACB registered an FIR against the tribunal ahlmad.

On May 20, the Special Judge was transferred from Rouse Avenue Court to different territory by the precocious tribunal done an administrative order.

In his petition earlier the precocious court, the ahlmad sought quashing of the FIR arsenic good arsenic each consequent proceedings.

In the alternative, helium has prayed for a absorption from the precocious tribunal to transportation of the lawsuit to CBI for a just and due investigation. The petitioners counsel alleged that FIR was registered aft an bid was passed by the proceedings tribunal justice connected May 15 issuing amusement origin was issued against the Joint Commissioner of Anti-Corruption Branch arsenic to wherefore notation for contempt of Court not to beryllium made to the precocious court.

While seeking extortion from “victimization" by officers of ACB nether the Whistle Blowers Protection Act, helium besides sought a departmental enquiry against 2 officers of the ACB for alleged “underhand dealings, corruption, blackmailing, transgression intimidation, maltreatment of office, misuse of authorities machinery, forgery, and fabrication of documents, abduction intimidation of witnesses, and demolition of authoritative record".

Location :

First Published:

News india ACB Filed Bribery Case To 'Settle Score' With Judge: Ahlmad To Delhi Court