Clip Reveals Anti-Graft Official Targeting Delhi Judge Over Orders Criticising Watchdog

Advertisement

Last Updated:May 26, 2025, 17:13 IST

Audio clip allegedly captures ACP admitting effort to framework justice implicit adverse orders. Court staffer seeks autarkic probe, cites intimidation by ACB.

Audio signaling presented successful Delhi High Court allegedly captures elder authoritative from anti-corruption portion admitting unit tactics against a justice captious of the agency. (IMAGE: PIXABAY)

An audio signaling submitted to the Delhi High Court has triggered superior allegations of misconduct wrong the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB). The portion allegedly captures a elder ACB serviceman admitting that the bureau targeted a Special Judge arsenic retaliation for a bid of adverse judicial orders, sources told News18.

According to the audio, the Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) with the ACB is heard saying that the justice had issued aggregate orders captious of the agency’s investigations. He suggests that an FIR filed against the judge’s tribunal unit was a effect to those rulings. The serviceman besides makes a veiled threat, indicating that if the justice continued passing specified orders, determination would beryllium consequences.

The judge, reportedly besides heard successful the recording, denies having immoderate idiosyncratic motive and says the ACB could person challenged his orders legally alternatively of attempting to intimidate tribunal unit oregon manipulate statements. The serviceman claims helium was sharing these details with the justice connected “humanitarian grounds."

The tribunal staffer successful question, identified arsenic Ahmad, has filed a writ petition successful the Delhi High Court seeking to quash the FIR oregon transportation the probe to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Ahmad served successful the Special Judge’s courtroom from September 2023 to March 2025. He claims ACB officials repeatedly threatened him, prompting him to petition a transportation successful January 2025.

He alleges that aft the justice issued a contempt announcement to the ACB connected May 16, the bureau retaliated by lodging a fabricated FIR against him and attempting to implicate the judge. Ahmad’s anticipatory bail plea was denied by the proceedings tribunal connected May 22, though the justice directed that owed process indispensable beryllium followed if immoderate apprehension is made.

In his petition, Ahmad accuses ACB officials of corruption, transgression intimidation, papers forgery and maltreatment of authority. The High Court has asked the Delhi authorities to taxable a presumption study by May 29.

Earlier, connected February 14, the High Court had dismissed the ACB’s petition to analyse the justice for bribery, citing a deficiency of evidence. While it allowed the bureau to proceed its probe, the tribunal required it to nutrient further impervious earlier reopening that peculiar case. The justice was subsequently transferred to different territory done an administrative bid connected May 20.

Location :

First Published:

News india Clip Reveals Anti-Graft Official Targeting Delhi Judge Over Orders Criticising Watchdog